Build maintainable Playwright and Selenium test suites around the risks that matter. QATitans combines web, mobile, and API automation with CI/CD integration, repeatable test data, and actionable failure reports.
We align our approach with your requirements, development process, and release goals.
Discuss your requirements ↗We design the framework, test data, assertions, and execution workflow together. The aim is a suite your engineers can run, investigate, and extend as the application changes.
Cover critical user flows with resilient locators, meaningful assertions, and isolated sessions. Define a browser and device matrix around actual usage, with real-device checks where needed.
Playwright · Selenium · Cypress · Appium
Validate schemas, status codes, business rules, authorization, and negative cases. Use contract checks and controlled service mocks to expose integration failures earlier.
Postman · REST Assured · Karate · Pact · WireMock
Build reusable fixtures, API clients, page or component objects where useful, and environment configuration. Keep assertions close to the behavior being tested and separate setup from test intent.
pytest · JUnit · TestNG · Cucumber
Run focused smoke checks on pull requests and broader regression on an agreed schedule. Parallelize independent tests, publish artifacts, and fail release checks on agreed criteria.
Jenkins · GitHub Actions · GitLab CI/CD · Azure Pipelines
Create deterministic setup and cleanup routines, unique test accounts, and controlled dependency responses. Use containerized execution where it improves consistency and keep secrets in the CI secret store.
Docker · Kubernetes · SQL · API fixtures
Capture traces, screenshots, request logs, and run metadata. Investigate flaky tests separately from product defects and retain first-attempt failures when retries are enabled.
Playwright traces · Allure Report · CI artifacts
A large test suite is only valuable when the team can trust its results. Repetitive manual regression, slow feedback, brittle scripts, and inconsistent test data are reasons to review your automation approach. Start with stable, high-value checks and expand coverage where it improves release decisions.
Review existing tests, application architecture, release cadence, and repeatable user journeys. Identify what should remain exploratory or manual.
Agree on tools, test layers, environment needs, and data setup. Evaluate options such as Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, or Appium against the product rather than choosing a tool first.
Create reusable test components and meaningful assertions. Cover API behavior, critical workflows, and selected cross-browser scenarios.
Connect agreed checks to CI/CT, capture actionable failure evidence, and document how to run, investigate, and maintain the suite.
Confirm the deliverables and level of detail in your project scope.
No. Automation is useful for repeatable checks with clear expected outcomes. Exploratory testing, usability evaluation, and rapidly changing behavior still require human judgment.
An engagement can start with a review of failure patterns, test isolation, locators, data dependencies, and reporting. The review helps decide which tests to repair, redesign, retire, or add.